Archive for March 12th, 2010



12
Mar

Social Entrepreneurship Research

Social entrepreneurship is often seen as differing from other forms of entrepreneurship in the relatively larger emphasis put on social benefit over monetary benefit. However, a key component to entrepreneurship remains — that is, the need and ability to demonstrate profitability to ensure scale and long term viability, which in turn maximize social benefit.

As a field of scholarly investigation, social entrepreneurship provides a unique opportunity to constantly challenge and rethink standard business and management assumptions.

Social enterprise research is therefore often “a source of explanation, prediction, and delight,” according to IESE Business School academics, Johanna Mair and Ignasi Marti. Their article, Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction and Delight,” elaborates on the view that social entrepreneurship is a process that catalyzes social change and addresses social need in a way not dominated by direct financial benefit for the entrepreneur.

The article explores several themes along the way. Crucially, it distinguishes social enterprises from regular enterprises as the “relative priority given to social wealth creation versus economic wealth creation.”

Therefore the authors believe, the concept of embededness (or social value within economic value) as the nexus between the ideas and theoretical perspectives for the study of social entrepreneurship introduced in the last section.

These theoretical perspectives are divided as follows:

Structuration Theory: That it is impossible to detach the agent (social entrepreneur) from the sturcture (community, society).

Institutional Entrepreneurship: These are actors who have an interest in modifying institutional sturctures or creating new ones. They leverage resources to create new institutions and transform existing ones.

Social Capital: This is broadly defined by researchers as actual and potential assets embedded in relationships among individuals, communities, networks and societies.

Social Movements: Which researchers have found focus their efforts on four key issues: a) political opportunities and threats, b) resource mobilizing structures and active appropriation of sites for mobilization, c) collective action frames and identity formation; and d) established reportoires of contention and innovative collective action by challengers and their member opponents.

Read the entire article here.

  • Share/Bookmark
12
Mar

Non-farm enterprises growth: Evidence from Tanzania

Throughout the world a majority of rural business activities revolve around the agriculture/farming sector. Nonfarm enterprises have been slow to grow, and are often limited by supply side factors such as access to finance, road infrastructure, rural cell phone communication and so on.

In their paper, Small Enterprise Growth and the Rural Investment Climate: Evindence from Tanzania, authors Tidiane Kinda and Josef L. Loening analyze nonfarm enterprises in Tanzania — their growth in employment, business challenges and constraints. The authors discuss a number of factors that would help unleash the full potential of private-sector led businesses. The study also looks at the investment climate and supply side issues mentioned above, demonstrating that marginal improvements in the rural investment climate matter for growth.

This paper is part of a World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, and is available here.

  • Share/Bookmark
Copyright © 2010 villgro.org, All Rights Reserved. The Villgro logo, the phrase Unconvention, Innohub and Wantrapreneur are trademarks of Villgro.